Not even with yours...
The above Jabba the Hutt lookalike is Charlotte Sutton.
She was given nine months 'youth detention' earlier this week for doing the following to her fifteen month old daughter...
Full story here.
That is all.
.
She was given nine months 'youth detention' earlier this week for doing the following to her fifteen month old daughter...
Yes, they are cigarette burns.
Full story here.
That is all.
.
19 comments:
The picture itself speaks the unspeakable.
She looks like Arthur Mullard after he's been smashed in the face with a shovel.
She needs a good shovel in the face as well. Or maybe a good dousing with petrol and then set on fire - see how she likes being burned.
I have no doubt that she will get what's coming to her in prison. I don't of course mean the horrible food and the uncomfortable beds.
It's a well known fact that prisoners don't like people who hurt kids any more than the rest of us do, and given that prison officers don't like them much they seem to have a high marginal propensity for being at the other end of the cell block when this kind of offender is getting his or head kicked in, or banging into a door.
I went to visit the grave of wee Brandon Muir a couple of weeks ago. As I looked down I thought of the ugly little scroat that jumped on the wee lad's body and ruptured his spleen, then went off to a party with the child in unimaginable pain, and I felt reasonably sure that right now that disgusting peice of detritus is getting his. It comforted me a little
The wonder is though that this female ever had a child... I mean who was the bloke for god's sake.... an escapee from a lunatic asylum for the seriously blind?
Some things are just so fucking incomprehensible it's a waste of time trying to understand them.
Not alot you can say to that, is there?
Bitch!
Have a heart guys and gals, she was " stressed out " having run out of Stella.
I suppose, Banned, if you're that plug ugly you'd probably need a constant supply of Stella or Midnight White or whatever it is to protect you from the reality that is you.
Like I say, she'll get it in prison, big time. The "shrug" that she gave will have been well and truly shown to be misplaced indifference after the first night behind bars.
I hope she likes violence!
He he he he he.
tris
I think you've been watching too much tv. Nothing will happen to her in prison. She will be in a seperate wing and will live quite comfortably.
Brandon Muirs death is the result of 30 years of government policy. People voted for this and should share the blame. Single parent families encouraged, upward mobility laughed at and discouraged, free meathadone, endless benefits. All voted for by the masses who now scream at Brandons killers. Where were these righteous people when we warned them ?
And you said.....
" The wonder is though that this female ever had a child... I mean who was the bloke for god's sake.... an escapee from a lunatic asylum for the seriously blind? "
What an evil thing to say. Probably the attitude she grew up with. Along with the squalor and endless benefit culture of her parents which led her to be an evil bastard aswell.
Social workers only seem to target the children of decent families to meet their adoption "targets", thus breaking up a whole family and causing untold heartache for the parents AND the child, just so they can put a tick in their fucking box.
The children who really need to be taken into care for their own protection seem to be left in situ with sadistic mothers/boyfriends etc. - just look at that callous bitch Sharon Shoesmith and her fucking useless Social Services department who knowingly left Baby Peter to his fate - I'd like to put a tick in her box - a LIVE one!!
"An eye for an eye" and "a burn for a burn".
Bejesus, what poor male coupled with that fucking land whale? You just know she is going end up on Jeremy Kyles chav fodder tele show at some future point.
I have to agree with killemallletgodsortemout, she needs to be spayed.
She will not get what is owing to her in jail. There is no 'code' among prisoners anymore, even if there ever was. Most of her fellow inmates wont care, and the ones that do will be a minority and mostly gutless.
The officers will have a duty of care and will be held responsible for anything that happens to her. She will have a cell with a tv and all the food and medical care she demands for the duation.
There is no justice in this country anymore. The police that do care are tied up with so much red tape and bullshit they are virtualy powerless to do their jobs properly. The courts could not give out a proper sentance even if they wanted to, because of the government targets to keep prison populations down. With an election coming up labour want all their supporters out and eligable to vote. Then if they ever make it to prison, they will never serve the whole of the sentance they were given (we will be lucky if she serves more than a couple of months), and it is simply Butlins with bars. No discipline, because it may upset them or violate their 'human rights'. There was me thinking you had to be human to have human rights.
Then to top it all off she will probably get a bigger flat, or maybe a house, upon release, a lot more benefit money, and some non-existant supervision from social services. Of course she will get the baby back, she has 'learned her lesson' and we would not want to violate her human rights now would we.
This country make me fucking sick!
Unusually, I disagree with Edgar - although I think he means the burns, whereas I mean the wider situation.
In this case we could reasonably ask "how come the 19 year old was with a baby in the first place?" because I'm betting that this is a single mother who might have taken rather more care over contraception if she were not automatically granted a council flat and benefits.
Remember that there is a lead time on the preparation of a case: I haven't cross-referenced the reports yet but if Sutton is 19 now, and the child was 15 months old at the time of the offence, then allowing for gestation, Sutton can barely have been 16 when she became pregnant.
I'm further betting - since the grandmother alerted the social services - that there is a longer tale than this. Typically I'd expect anonymity and gagging orders all round - unless the case has been run under false names - as the council would be looking at an adoption procedure, to get her settled before the age of 5. Here they don't appear to have asked for any, so presumably they are leaving the child in the care of the grandmother, with which I have no quarrel, I'm just noting it.
Note also that the grandmother's name is given as Pauline Eaton, which might indicate she is the paternal grandmother, which would be consistent with the choice of words in the quote. I'm not for one moment excusing Sutton, but is an interesting question as to why, (if she is indeed the paternal grandmother) Mrs Eaton's boy wasn't taught how to use a condom. Where is he now, and what was his role, if any, in it?
It is amazing that the photos of the injuries have been distributed - although relevant evidence to the jury, it is arguably the private health record of the child and no more acceptable to publish than the photo records of the intimate examinations which will also have been done.
There is plenty which needs to be understood about the circumstances of this case to see if there is anything reasonable we can do to make repeats less likely.
Yes, there will always be some sick bastards. The main thing is, are we doing anything which might inadvertently be encouraging them?
woman on a raft
I read somewhere else that this photo isn't the girl in question. Just a stock photo to show the type of torture recieved.
@ Barking Spider, have you visited Leg Iron's place today? Read para 6 here:
http://leg-iron.livejournal.com/235083.html
1:49 PM
Many thanks Anon.
Fucking bitch needs to be flayed and salted, and all we can hand out is "youth detention"? Fuck.
Spayed - and without benefit of anaesthetic I think.
Post a Comment