Saturday, June 19, 2010

Spot the difference...

Scotland team - 1978 (Argentina)




England team 2010 (South Africa)


No difference. Both a shambles.


Bet the Sun regrets printing this!



8 comments:

girl x said...

The English team looks rather more fit... but then so do most men these days in comparison to the 70s. I actually think I prefer the mullets, though! ;-)

TheBigYin said...

I know how you feel Rab. I wouldn't be sat here wearing an England shirt, go to the shops wearing my England baseball cap* if Scotland had made it to the finals.

What a fookin' shambles! I'm off to the shops now to buy a can of lighter fluid.

*I know, a Scotsman, and a Glaswegian at that, wearing such things doesn't bear thinking about. Just put it down to a bout of insanity.

The Big Dollop said...

Rab

I was just thinking along the same lines .. the comparrision's with scotland's totally inept performances in 78 are more than obvious.

semper fi

TBD

Oldrightie said...

England Team, Rab? More like a group of psychos forced to share a therapy session. As foe Shrek, what a multi-millionaire Madoff!

Mr. Mxyzptlk said...

same old sun same old fucking liars


dont listen to oldrightie he dont know nuffin about football.

he is an Tory supporting rugby fan

Dazed And Confused said...

The major difference that I can ascertain, is probably around eight grand per week, per man, although the "talent" is somewhat similar.

If the useless cunts go out to the mighty Slovakia on Wednesday night, Shrek may well consider moving abroad to play, as in England he'll be barracked up and down the fucking Country, and rightly so, the over pampered winging prick.

Conan the Librarian™ said...

D and C
You *are* confused :¬)

Dazed And Confused said...

@ Conan the Librarian

Typo:

@ Eighty grand a week.